Overall, wind costs have
dropped significantly in recent years, and looking at its true costs indicates
it is much cheaper. There are a few different ways you
can measure electricity cost. For example:
- Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) — the utility way (the average cost over the lifespan of the project, initial investments plus operation and maintenance costs, not including externalities).
- “All In” — taking into account externalities — health/environmental costs (these are real costs that we pay that vary according to the energy source).
The figures you normally see are
according to LCOE, which artificially makes the cost of coal cheaper than it
should be. Without even taking externalities into account, wind is already
beating coal. Wind has gotten cheaper
and cheaper while coal is getting more expensive (and that trend isn’t expected
to change).
While LCOE is widely used to compare
various sources of energy, even not including the fact that it doesn’t account
for health or environmental costs, it has its weaknesses. For example, LCOE for
wind projects are often based on a 20-year lifetimes for wind turbines.
The Department of Energy, found the
price of electricity from new wind farm plants ranged from 4 to 9 cents per
kilowatt-hour in 2009, which is competitive with other new power plants.
However, if a 30- or 40-year lifespan were used for the projects, the costs
would be much lower, as the huge majority of a wind project’s costs are from
the initial investment (wind, the ‘fuel’, is free and there are minimal
operating and maintenance costs).
If you take the full health costs
and environmental costs of various energy sources into account, wind comes out
looking even better. A recent study out of Harvard found that if one adds in
the hidden costs of coal then its
actual price in the U.S. is 9-27 cents higher per kilowatt hour. These and the
more difficult to quantify externalities are borne by the general public.
This makes the true, “all-in”
cost of coal electricity somewhere between 17 cents and 35 cents per kWh. You
pay 8 cents or so per kWh on your electricity bill and then quite a bit more
than that in healthcare costs, health insurance premiums, and with your tax
dollars. Wind? It’s sticking to its original 4 to 9 cents per kWh.
Wind has no fuel costs. That is an advantage today, but with peak coal coming in the not-too-distant future, this is likely to make wind increasingly cheaper than coal. (Of course, if we just cut our coal use now, we wouldn’t even have to run into peak coal, but it seems that we aren’t so foresighted.) There are numerous reasons to shift more to wind power and numerous reasons why it would help create a more secure, brighter future.
http://cleantechnica.com/world-wind-power/5/
Wind has no fuel costs. That is an advantage today, but with peak coal coming in the not-too-distant future, this is likely to make wind increasingly cheaper than coal. (Of course, if we just cut our coal use now, we wouldn’t even have to run into peak coal, but it seems that we aren’t so foresighted.) There are numerous reasons to shift more to wind power and numerous reasons why it would help create a more secure, brighter future.
http://cleantechnica.com/world-wind-power/5/
No comments:
Post a Comment